<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:51:26 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Tatter - Episodes Tagged with “History”</title>
    <link>https://tatter.fireside.fm/tags/history</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>This is a podcast exploring issues in politics and policy. Each episode features conversation with at least one subject matter expert, with a goal of helping listeners better understand the topic.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Politics and Policy</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Michael Sargent</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>This is a podcast exploring issues in politics and policy. Each episode features conversation with at least one subject matter expert, with a goal of helping listeners better understand the topic.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/f/fdeb9f47-842e-4e4f-a682-7d5bb6e8d5a0/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>politics, policy, law</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Michael Sargent</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>profsargent@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 29: Mission Creep (On Carrying Implicit Bias Too Far)</title>
  <link>https://tatter.fireside.fm/29</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">7293f664-500f-453b-9424-fea2ef370ae7</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
  <author>Michael Sargent</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/fdeb9f47-842e-4e4f-a682-7d5bb6e8d5a0/7293f664-500f-453b-9424-fea2ef370ae7.mp3" length="16630579" type="audio/mp3"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Michael Sargent</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>A conversation about implicit bias, and potential overextension and overapplication of it, with Jonathan Kahn, author of Race on the Brain.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>31:37</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/f/fdeb9f47-842e-4e4f-a682-7d5bb6e8d5a0/episodes/7/7293f664-500f-453b-9424-fea2ef370ae7/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>ABOUT THIS EPISODE
Talk of implicit bias has moved far beyond its origin in psychology. It's spread to law journals, it informs training in many workplaces (including one famous coffeeshop chain (https://news.starbucks.com/press-releases/starbucks-to-close-stores-nationwide-for-racial-bias-education-may-29)), and it's entered popular discourse. Does that ubiquity carry risks? What balls are we potentially taking our eyes off of when we focus on implicit bias? These are the kinds of issues addressed in my conversation with Jonathan Kahn, the James E. Kelley Chair in Tort Law at the Mitchell Hamline School of Law, and author of the book Race on the Brain.
LINKS
--Jonathan Kahn's Mitchell Hamline webpage (https://mitchellhamline.edu/biographies/person/dr-jonathan-kahn/)
--Race on the Brain: What Implicit Bias Gets Wrong About the Struggle for Racial Justice, by Jonathan Kahn (https://www.amazon.com/Race-Brain-Implicit-Struggle-Justice/dp/0231184247)
--Project Implicit (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/)
--"How the GI Bill left out African Americans," by David Callahan (Demos) (https://www.demos.org/blog/11/11/13/how-gi-bill-left-out-african-americans)
--Racism Without Racists, by Eduardo Bonilla-Silva (https://www.amazon.com/Racism-without-Racists-Color-Blind-Persistence/dp/1442276231/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_t_0?_encoding=UTF8&amp;amp;psc=1&amp;amp;refRID=FVYNRHR64CMPPEK2PX0X)
--"The American civil rights tradition: Anticlassification or antisubordination?" by Jack Balkin and Reva Siegel (https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/Faculty/Siegel_TheAmericanCivilRightsTraditionAnticlassificationOrAntisubordination.pdf)
--"Chief Justice out to end affirmative action," by Jeffrey Toobin (CNN) (https://www.cnn.com/2013/02/28/opinion/toobin-roberts-voting-rights-act/index.html)
--"Sotomayor accuses colleagues of trying to 'wish away' racial inequality," by Robert Barnes (Washington Post) (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sotomayor-accuses-colleagues-of-trying-to-wish-away-racial-inequality/2014/04/22/e5892f90-ca49-11e3-93eb-6c0037dde2ad_story.html?utm_term=.703dbfd627fa) Special Guest: Jonathan Kahn.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>implicit bias, IAT, racial justice, history, psychology</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p><strong>ABOUT THIS EPISODE</strong><br>
Talk of implicit bias has moved far beyond its origin in psychology. It&#39;s spread to law journals, it informs training in many workplaces (<a href="https://news.starbucks.com/press-releases/starbucks-to-close-stores-nationwide-for-racial-bias-education-may-29" rel="nofollow">including one famous coffeeshop chain</a>), and it&#39;s entered popular discourse. Does that ubiquity carry risks? What balls are we potentially taking our eyes off of when we focus on implicit bias? These are the kinds of issues addressed in my conversation with Jonathan Kahn, the James E. Kelley Chair in Tort Law at the Mitchell Hamline School of Law, and author of the book <em>Race on the Brain.</em></p>

<p><strong>LINKS</strong><br>
<a href="https://mitchellhamline.edu/biographies/person/dr-jonathan-kahn/" rel="nofollow">--Jonathan Kahn&#39;s Mitchell Hamline webpage</a><br>
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Race-Brain-Implicit-Struggle-Justice/dp/0231184247" rel="nofollow"><em>--Race on the Brain: What Implicit Bias Gets Wrong About the Struggle for Racial Justice</em>, by Jonathan Kahn</a><br>
<a href="https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/" rel="nofollow">--Project Implicit</a><br>
<a href="https://www.demos.org/blog/11/11/13/how-gi-bill-left-out-african-americans" rel="nofollow">--&quot;How the GI Bill left out African Americans,&quot; by David Callahan (Demos)</a><br>
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Racism-without-Racists-Color-Blind-Persistence/dp/1442276231/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_t_0?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=FVYNRHR64CMPPEK2PX0X" rel="nofollow"><em>--Racism Without Racists</em>, by Eduardo Bonilla-Silva</a><br>
<a href="https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/Faculty/Siegel_TheAmericanCivilRightsTraditionAnticlassificationOrAntisubordination.pdf" rel="nofollow">--&quot;The American civil rights tradition: Anticlassification or antisubordination?&quot; by Jack Balkin and Reva Siegel</a><br>
<a href="https://www.cnn.com/2013/02/28/opinion/toobin-roberts-voting-rights-act/index.html" rel="nofollow">--&quot;Chief Justice out to end affirmative action,&quot; by Jeffrey Toobin (CNN)</a><br>
<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sotomayor-accuses-colleagues-of-trying-to-wish-away-racial-inequality/2014/04/22/e5892f90-ca49-11e3-93eb-6c0037dde2ad_story.html?utm_term=.703dbfd627fa" rel="nofollow">--&quot;Sotomayor accuses colleagues of trying to &#39;wish away&#39; racial inequality,&quot; by Robert Barnes (Washington Post)</a></p><p>Special Guest: Jonathan Kahn.</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p><strong>ABOUT THIS EPISODE</strong><br>
Talk of implicit bias has moved far beyond its origin in psychology. It&#39;s spread to law journals, it informs training in many workplaces (<a href="https://news.starbucks.com/press-releases/starbucks-to-close-stores-nationwide-for-racial-bias-education-may-29" rel="nofollow">including one famous coffeeshop chain</a>), and it&#39;s entered popular discourse. Does that ubiquity carry risks? What balls are we potentially taking our eyes off of when we focus on implicit bias? These are the kinds of issues addressed in my conversation with Jonathan Kahn, the James E. Kelley Chair in Tort Law at the Mitchell Hamline School of Law, and author of the book <em>Race on the Brain.</em></p>

<p><strong>LINKS</strong><br>
<a href="https://mitchellhamline.edu/biographies/person/dr-jonathan-kahn/" rel="nofollow">--Jonathan Kahn&#39;s Mitchell Hamline webpage</a><br>
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Race-Brain-Implicit-Struggle-Justice/dp/0231184247" rel="nofollow"><em>--Race on the Brain: What Implicit Bias Gets Wrong About the Struggle for Racial Justice</em>, by Jonathan Kahn</a><br>
<a href="https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/" rel="nofollow">--Project Implicit</a><br>
<a href="https://www.demos.org/blog/11/11/13/how-gi-bill-left-out-african-americans" rel="nofollow">--&quot;How the GI Bill left out African Americans,&quot; by David Callahan (Demos)</a><br>
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Racism-without-Racists-Color-Blind-Persistence/dp/1442276231/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_t_0?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=FVYNRHR64CMPPEK2PX0X" rel="nofollow"><em>--Racism Without Racists</em>, by Eduardo Bonilla-Silva</a><br>
<a href="https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/Faculty/Siegel_TheAmericanCivilRightsTraditionAnticlassificationOrAntisubordination.pdf" rel="nofollow">--&quot;The American civil rights tradition: Anticlassification or antisubordination?&quot; by Jack Balkin and Reva Siegel</a><br>
<a href="https://www.cnn.com/2013/02/28/opinion/toobin-roberts-voting-rights-act/index.html" rel="nofollow">--&quot;Chief Justice out to end affirmative action,&quot; by Jeffrey Toobin (CNN)</a><br>
<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sotomayor-accuses-colleagues-of-trying-to-wish-away-racial-inequality/2014/04/22/e5892f90-ca49-11e3-93eb-6c0037dde2ad_story.html?utm_term=.703dbfd627fa" rel="nofollow">--&quot;Sotomayor accuses colleagues of trying to &#39;wish away&#39; racial inequality,&quot; by Robert Barnes (Washington Post)</a></p><p>Special Guest: Jonathan Kahn.</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
